John

April 16, 2010

Feeling good

Filed under: Life in Corporal — John @ 8:38 pm

Got an A on my Intermediate Accounting II test (at least a 93) and a 100 on my Management test. Still have an A average in at least 3 of my 5 classes with the fourth looking like a high B and one unknown but either A or B. This semester is almost over and it’s turning out pretty well all things considered.

Got a professor to agree to an independent study project second summer semester so after I get the associated paperwork completed and register I’ll be on track to get my BBA this December and start on my MBA in the spring.

January 31, 2010

the evil homosexual

Filed under: Life in Corporal — John @ 9:09 pm

So, whadya know. A (gay) guy is introduced in a prime-time television series (“Bones” in this instance) and is immediately cast as an evil, homicidal villian. As the show progresses, we’ll see how this plays out… but in the meantime.. I am reminded of the 1995 film “The Celluloid Closet” narrated by Lily Tomlin. This version of the homosexual is a recurrent theme in Hollywood and has been for decades.

(more…)

January 24, 2010

Social Security Sucks

Filed under: Life in Corporal — Tags: — John @ 2:26 am

They want it both ways.


The progressive liberals who want to pass heath care want to hold up Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid as examples of successful government run programs [1]. They say that Social Security has never missed a payment yet [2] (but ignore the fact that it’s trust-fund does not actually exist, the program is soon-to-be insolvent [3], and payments will have to be made from the general fund by 2016).


Social Security, as a retirement system and method to keep people out of poverty, is a failure. The system is a ponzi scheme with new entrants into the system compelled by the threat of force to pay for the benefits of the people who are leaving the system. The extra money that was paid in over the last few generations? Spent on wars, irresponsible social policies, and bridges to nowhere. Read this defense of Social Security [4]. Business Week author Michael Mandel argues that SS isn’t a ponzi scheme because our technology and ability to grow our GDP will always improve enough to cover all future costs.


Sounds like this guy wasn’t paying attention to the last two asset bubbles the Federal Reserve inflated to boost that “always increasing” economy.


What Social Security has done, it has done well. It has destroyed the family unit by destroying the need for it. No longer do husband and wife need to remain together for financial support, they can get a divorce just because their current situation is no longer convenient. No longer do the children feel any need to support their parents, that’s now become the government’s job. And the government has done an excellent job of teaching them this new way of thinking. With the family destroyed and mocked as an archaic institution the government has virtually guaranteed that those people, who historically would support their parents in their old age and in turn be supported by their children when they became old, would now become dependent upon the largess of the government.


It used to be considered shameful to accept charity from your neighbors or welfare from the state. Now it has become a bragging right. The state has gone out of its way to make sure the dependent class it has created feels no shame attached to that dependency. By teaching these people that it is their right to receive these benefits by virtue of having “paid” for them, they removed that stigma. If you are on Social Security or receive Medicare or Medicaid benefits, you did not pay for them. You paid (if at all) for someone else’s benefits. Your benefits are being paid by the generation now working.


The state cannot make money for these programs, it can only move money from one person to another, taking a little bit out on the way for the trouble. As the capital is transferred from productive to non-productive uses the ability of the country as a whole to succeed and prosper is lessened.

[1] http://www.examiner.com/x-4380-Healthcare-Reform-Examiner~y2009m8d7-Republicans-admit-Medicare-is-good-governmentrun-healthcare

[2] http://www.scfl.org/?ulnid=1562

[3] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/12/AR2009051200252.html

[4] http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/economicsunbound/archives/2008/12/is_social_secur.html

January 17, 2010

Obama’s latest tactic to pass his bills? guilt ‘em!

Filed under: Life in Corporal — John @ 6:19 pm

From FOXNews.com:

As Democratic fears increase that health insurance reform could slip away people are finally waking up to the insurance company bailout with a crucial vote for a new U.S. senator in Massachusetts, President Obama on Sunday used a church pulpit at a Martin Luther King Day service to say the massive health bill would be a victory for “decency.” the health insurance industry and government regulators.

“This will be a victory not for Democrats 30 million uninsured,” Obama said. “It will be a victory for dignity Blue Cross and decency Humana, and for our common humanity enlarged beauracracy. It will be a victory for the United States of America‘s ever expanding government.”

This guy disgusts me. And that people keep eating out his hand even more so. Only good thing about the ever increasing descent into madness is that it hastens the end and shortens the time until a correction can occur.

January 12, 2010

Change you can believe in… and another blog I can’t stand to read anymore…

Filed under: Life in Corporal — John @ 12:32 pm

From the Baseline Scenario

As they justify their pay packages, the bankers open up a broader relevant question: How much bonus do they deserve in this situation? After all, bonus time is when you decide who made what kind of relative contribution to your bottom line – and you are able to recognize unusually strong achievement.

  1. If the bonuses are not paid, people will leave our major banks. It’s unlikely that many good people will leave, but if they do move to smaller institutions that are not Too Big To Fail, that’s good for the rest of us.
  2. Big banks made these profits fair-and-square, so the bonuses belong to the workforce. This is wrong at two levels (a) the profits in 2009 (and 2008) were solely the result of massive government intervention, designed at saving and recapitalizing big banks, and (b) the recapitalization part of that strategy only works if the profits generated are retained – not if they are paid out.
  3. You cannot now tax the bonuses for 2009 without violating all the norms of reasonable taxation – i.e., that it not be retroactive, not be confiscatory, and not mess seriously with incentives. Ordinarily, these are good arguments. But today’s circumstances are so egregious that we need to take highly unusual steps. The banks and their key employees are so far from understanding what they did wrong, they don’t even have a framework within which they can understand what they need to do right going forward. This industry needs a wake-up call.

Ok. so far I follow. But, if we consider that bonus amounts should be tied to relative contribution, then all of these bankers do deserve huge bonuses. From a purely business perspective, they were able to get the government to dump money into them, keeping them afloat in a time when otherwise they likely would have failed. Their actions leading up to this should be rewarded by those companies that they kept alive.

(more…)

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress